Breast Cancer Risk Factors Table
The table below lists factors linked (or not linked in some cases) to breast cancer. It also lists many factors still under study.
Factors are grouped based on the strength of the scientific evidence:
- Established and probable factors have the strongest evidence behind them. They are recognized as linked (or not linked in some cases) to breast cancer.
- Possible factors have less evidence behind them. There are suggested links to breast cancer with these factors, but more study is needed before solid conclusions can be made.
- Insufficient or inconsistent factors are backed by few studies or the studies to date show mixed results, so there’s not enough evidence to allow comment on possible links to breast cancer.
Click on any of the factors below to learn more.
Established and probable factors
Recognized as linked (or not linked in some cases) to breast cancer.
Legend | |
Linked to an increased risk of breast cancer | |
Linked to a decreased risk of breast cancer | |
Not related to breast cancer risk (not linked to an increased risk) |
Established and Probable Factors | ||
Linked to an increased risk of breast cancer | ||
Linked to a decreased risk of breast cancer | ||
| ||
Not related to breast cancer risk (not related to an increased risk) | ||
Electromagnetic fields (from utility wires, electric blankets, etc.) |
||
Blood organochlorine levels (exposure to certain types of pesticides and industrial chemicals) | Menopausal hormone therapy pills – estrogen only (less than 10 years of use) | |
|
Possible factors
Recognized as potentially linked (or not linked in some cases) to breast cancer. More study is needed before solid conclusions can be made. These factors are still under study.
Legend | |
Linked to an increased risk of breast cancer | |
Linked to a decreased risk of breast cancer | |
Not related to breast cancer risk (not linked to an increased or decreased risk) |
Possible Factors | |
Linked to an increased risk of breast cancer | |
Linked to a decreased risk of breast cancer | |
|
|
Not related to breast cancer risk (not related to an increased or decreased risk) | |
Factors with inconsistent results or insufficient evidence
For these factors, there are few studies or study results are very mixed. More research is needed to comment on any possible link to breast cancer.
(Listed alphabetically.)
Factors with Inconsistent Results or Insufficient Evidence | |
DES (in utero exposure and breast cancer risk among offspring) |
|
Levels of scientific evidence
Level of scientific evidence to support a link with breast cancer risk |
|
Established factors |
|
Probable factors |
|
Possible factors |
|
Factors with inconsistent findings or insufficient evidence |
|
Adapted from criteria outlined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). |
Watch our video of Komen Scholar Dr. Jennifer Ligibel who talks about some factors linked to breast cancer risk.
What is a risk factor?
Anything linked to a person’s chance of getting a disease is called a risk factor.
A risk factor can be related to:
- Genetics (such as family history)
- Lifestyle (such as exercise)
- Reproductive history (such as age at your first menstrual period)
- The environment (such as radiation exposure)
Cancer tends to be related to a combination of factors. Some things we may be able to control (such as exercise). Others are out of our control (such as age), and some are still unknown. Since many factors are linked to cancer risk and we can control only some of them, we can’t avoid some amount of risk.
Most breast cancer risk factors we have some control over are linked to only a small increase or decrease in risk. Because the disease process is so complex, it’s hard to know how a certain set of risk factors will work in any one person.
Where do the data come from?
Human studies
The data in this table come from 2 main types of research studies:
- Observational studies (cohort or case-control)
- Randomized controlled trials
The goal of these studies is to give information that helps support or disprove an idea about a possible link between an exposure (such as alcohol use) and an outcome (such as breast cancer) in people.
Although they have the same goal, observational studies and randomized controlled trials differ in:
- The way they’re conducted
- The strength of the conclusions they reach
Learn more about different types of research studies.
Animal studies
Animal studies add to our understanding of how and why some factors may be linked to cancer in people.
However, there are many differences between animals and people, so it’s hard to translate findings directly from one to the other.
Animal studies are also designed differently. They often look at exposures in larger doses and for shorter periods of time than are suitable for people.
While animal studies can lay the groundwork for research in people, we need human studies to draw conclusions for people.
All the data you see in this section of the website come from human studies.
Finding information on risk factors
Susan G. Komen® has up-to-date information on many established, probable and possible risk factors for breast cancer. Komen also has information on many factors not related to risk.
Other health organizations conduct research and/or prepare detailed summary reports of research on certain factors shown to have a link (or no link) to breast cancer and other types of cancer, including:
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- National Toxicology Program (NTP)
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
- World Cancer Research Fund International
IARC is a part of the World Health Organization. The CDC, NTP and FDA are all part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. World Cancer Research Fund International is a non-profit organization.
To learn more about the role of the environment in breast cancer, Komen sponsored a study from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine), “Breast Cancer and the Environment, a Life Course Approach.” |
Updated 12/20/24
This content is regularly reviewed by an expert panel including researchers, practicing clinicians and patient advocates.