Emerging Areas in Risk Reduction and Estimating Risk
Read our blog, “It Looks Promising”: Dr. Kornelia Polyak is Uncovering New Possibilities in Breast Cancer Prevention.
Breast cancer risk reduction and risk assessment are active areas of research.
Some studies are looking at ways to lower risk (such as new risk-reducing drugs) in people at high risk of breast cancer.
Other studies are focused on new and better ways of knowing which women and men are at high risk.
Risk-reducing drugs
Some drugs used to treat breast cancer are under study in the risk reduction setting for women at higher risk.
New risk-reducing drugs are also being developed.
Learn about tamoxifen and raloxifene (FDA-approved drugs for lowering the risk of breast cancer).
Aromatase inhibitors
Aromatase inhibitors are hormone therapy drugs used to treat estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Exemestane (Aromasin) and anastrozole (Arimidex) are aromatase inhibitor drugs. Findings from randomized controlled trials of postmenopausal women at high risk have shown exemestane and anastrozole may reduce the risk of breast cancer by about half [232-233].
The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force list exemestane and anastrozole as risk-reducing drug options for postmenopausal women who don’t have breast cancer, but are at high risk of breast cancer.
However, exemestane and anastrozole aren’t FDA-approved for use in the risk reduction setting. They are only FDA-approved for use in breast cancer treatment.
Letrozole (Femara)
The aromatase inhibitor drug letrozole (Femara) is under study to see whether it lowers breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women at high risk.
Learn about aromatase inhibitors and breast cancer treatment.
Learn more about the side effects of aromatase inhibitors.
Lasofoxifene
Lasofoxifene is an osteoporosis drug similar to tamoxifen and raloxifene.
Early findings suggest lasofoxifene may reduce the risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in women at increased risk of osteoporosis [379-381]. More data are needed to confirm these findings.
Clinical trials of risk-reducing drugs
If you’re at higher risk of breast cancer and considering joining a risk-reducing drug clinical trial, discuss the potential risks and benefits with your health care provider.
Susan G. Komen® Patient Care Center |
If you or a loved one needs information or resources about clinical trials, the Patient Care Center can help. Contact the Komen Breast Care Helpline at 1-877-465-6636 or email clinicaltrialinfo@komen.org. Se habla español. |
BreastCancerTrials.org in collaboration with Komen offers a custom matching service to help find breast cancer risk reduction clinical trials.
Learn more about clinical trials.
Using breast cells to assess risk
Methods to assess breast cancer risk currently under study include [382]:
- Ductal lavage
- Nipple aspiration (nipple aspirate fluid cytology)
- Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA)
These procedures remove cells from the breast.
A pathologist looks at the cells under a microscope. Abnormal (atypical) cells may be linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, but these tests haven’t been shown to be effective for breast cancer risk assessment [382].
The procedures differ in how cells are removed from the breast.
Ductal lavage
Ductal lavage uses a small tube to flush out fluid from the nipple. This fluid contains breast cells.
This procedure causes some discomfort.
Ductal lavage hasn’t been shown to be effective for breast cancer risk assessment [382]. So, it’s not recommended for use outside of a clinical trial.
More research is needed to learn how to use the findings from ductal lavage.
Nipple aspiration (nipple aspirate fluid cytology)
Nipple aspiration (such as the HALO test) uses a breast pump, and sometimes massage, to remove fluid from the nipple.
Nipple aspiration hasn’t been shown to be effective for breast cancer risk assessment [382]. So, it’s not recommended for use outside of a clinical trial.
More research is needed to learn how to use the findings from nipple aspiration.
Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA)
RPFNA uses a thin needle to remove cells from about 10 areas near the areola.
This procedure is more invasive and causes more discomfort than ductal lavage or nipple aspiration.
RPFNA is under study and is not recommended for use outside of a clinical trial.
Ductal lavage, nipple aspiration or RPFNA and risk assessment
Ductal lavage, nipple aspiration and RPFNA are not recommended for use outside of a clinical trial.
The findings from these tests should not impact a woman’s decision to take a risk-reducing drug, have preventive surgery or join a clinical trial for risk reduction. They also should not be used to assess risk for breast cancer screening recommendations.
More research is needed to learn how to use the findings from these tests.
Breast cancer risk assessment is not breast cancer screening
Tests such as ductal lavage, nipple aspiration and RPFNA are under study for risk assessment. Risk assessment is not breast cancer screening (tests used to find cancer early).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states tests such as nipple aspiration are not substitutes for mammograms and shouldn’t be used in breast cancer screening or diagnosis [383].
Our commitment to research |
At Susan G. Komen®, we are committed to saving lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities and investing in breakthrough research to prevent and cure breast cancer. Our Research Program is an essential driving force for achieving this mission. Since our inception in 1982, Komen has provided funding to support research grants that have greatly expanded our knowledge of breast cancer and helped us understand that breast cancer is not just a single disease but many diseases, unique to each individual. To date, Komen has provided nearly $1.1 billion to researchers in 47 states, the District of Columbia and 24 countries to support research that has resulted in a better understanding of breast cancer; earlier detection; personalized, less invasive treatments for what was once a “one-treatment-fits-all” disease; and improvements in both quality of life and survival rates. Learn more about our continuing investment in research and the exciting research that we are funding, because nothing would make us happier than ending breast cancer forever. |
Updated 12/18/24
This content is regularly reviewed by an expert panel including researchers, practicing clinicians and patient advocates.
