Research table: Meat consumption and breast cancer risk
This summary table contains detailed information about research studies. Summary tables are a useful way to look at the science behind many breast cancer guidelines and recommendations. However, to get the most out of the tables, it’s important to understand some key concepts. Learn how to read a research table. |
Introduction: Studies have looked at the risk of breast cancer in people who eat a lot of meat (including total amount of meat eaten, as well as certain types of meat, such as red meat and poultry).
Although a few studies suggest eating a lot of meat may be linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, most studies have not found a link. This topic is under study.
Learn more about meat consumption and breast cancer risk.
Learn about the strengths and weaknesses of different types of studies.
See how this risk factor compares with other risk factors for breast cancer.
*Please note, the information provided within Komen Perspectives articles is only current as of the date of posting. Therefore, some information may be out of date.
Study selection criteria: Prospective cohort studies with at least 1,000 cases, pooled analyses and meta-analyses.
Table note: Relative risk above 1 indicates increased risk. Relative risk below 1 indicates decreased risk.
Study | Study Population | Follow-up | Type of Meat | Relative Risk of Breast Cancer in Women with the Highest Meat Intake versus Women with the Lowest Meat Intake, | |
Prospective cohort studies | |||||
NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study [1] | 193,742 | 9 | Total meat: 6 or more vs. | 1.06 | |
Red meat: 3 or more vs. | 1.04 | ||||
White meat: 4 or more vs. | 1.03 | ||||
Processed meat: | 1.04 | ||||
EPIC [2] | 319,826 | 9 | Red meat: 5 vs. | 1.06 | |
Poultry: 3 vs. | 1.02 | ||||
Processed meat: 3 vs. | 1.10 | ||||
UK Biobank [3] | 262,195 | 7 | Red meat: More than 1 vs. | 0.99 | |
|
|
| Processed meat: More than ½ vs. | 1.21 | |
Nurses’ Health Study [4] | 88,647 | 18 | Total meat: 14 or more vs. | 0.89 | |
Red meat: 9 or more vs. | 0.94 | ||||
Poultry: 4 or more vs. | 1.01 | ||||
Swedish Mammography Cohort [5] | 61,433 | 17 | Red meat: 6 vs. | 0.98 | |
Nurses’ Health Study II [6-7] | 88,803 | 19 | Red meat: 11 or more vs. | 1.22 | |
Chicken or turkey: 6 vs. | 0.91 | ||||
44,231 | Red meat during the teen years: 18 vs. | 1.17 | |||
UK Women’s Cohort Study [8] | 35,372 | 8 | Total meat: 28 or more vs. | 1.34 | |
Red meat: | 1.41 | ||||
Poultry: | 1.22 | ||||
Processed meat: | 1.39 | ||||
Sister Study [9] | 42,012 | 8 | Red meat: 3 or more vs. | 1.23 | |
|
|
| Processed meat: 2 or more vs. | 0.97 | |
|
|
| Poultry: 3 or more vs. | 0.85 | |
Black Women’s Health Study [10] | 52,062 | 12 | Red meat: 3 or more vs. | 1.02 | |
| Processed meat: 2 or more vs. | 0.99 | |||
PLCO Cancer Screening Trial [11] | 52,158 | 6 | Red meat: 3 vs. | 1.23 | |
White meat: 4 vs. | 1.01 | ||||
Processed meat: 1 vs. | 1.12 | ||||
Grilled or well-done meat: 1 vs. | 1.20 | ||||
Pooled and meta-analyses | |||||
Farvid et al. [12] |
16 studies |
|
Processed meat |
1.06 |
|
15 studies |
Red meat |
1.09 |
|||
Alexander et al. [13] |
1 pooled analysis and |
|
Red meat |
1.07 |
|
Processed meat |
1.08 |
||||
Missmer et al. [14] | 351,041 | up to 15 | Total meat | 1.08 | |
Red meat | 0.94 | ||||
White meat | 1.02 | ||||
Farvid et al. [15] | 15 cohort and nested case-control studies |
| Processed meat | 1.09 | |
| 13 cohort and nested case-control studies |
| Red meat | 1.06 | |
Guo et al. [16] | 14 cohort and nested case-control studies | Red meat | 1.10 | ||
12 cohort and nested case-control studies | Processed meat | 1.08 | |||
Wu et al. [17] | 14 cohort studies | Processed meat | 1.07 | ||
12 cohort studies | Red meat | 1.05 | |||
Anderson et al. [3] | 10 cohort studies |
| Red meat | 1.03 | |
| 8 cohort studies |
| Processed meat | 1.06 | |
Taylor et al. [18] | 3 cohort studies |
| Red meat | 1.11 | |
Boyd et al. [19] | 45 studies | Total meat | 1.13 |
† Servings per week were estimated from grams per day.
‡ Results were similar when data for premenopausal and postmenopausal women were examined separately.
§ Among premenopausal women, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.43 (1.05-1.94) and among postmenopausal women, the relative risk was 0.99 (0.72-1.37).
¶ Among premenopausal women, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.13 (0.99-1.29) and among postmenopausal women, the relative risk was 1.12 (1.01-1.26).
|| Among premenopausal women, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.45 (0.95-2.23) and among postmenopausal women, the relative risk was 1.64 (1.19-2.27).
References
- Inoue-Choi M, Sinha R, Gierach GL, Ward MH. Red and processed meat, nitrite, and heme iron intakes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Int J Cancer. 138(7):1609-18, 2016.
- Pala V, Krogh V, Berrino F, et al. Meat, eggs, dairy products, and risk of breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 90(3):602-12, 2009.
- Anderson JJ, Darwis NDM, Mackay DF, et al. Red and processed meat consumption and breast cancer: UK Biobank cohort study and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 90:73-82, 2018.
- Holmes MD, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, et al. Meat, fish and egg intake and risk of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 104(2):221-7, 2003.
- Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A. Long-term meat intake and risk of breast cancer by oestrogen and progesterone receptor status in a cohort of Swedish women. Eur J Cancer. 45(17):3042-6, 2009.
- Farvid MS, Cho E, Chen WY, Eliassen AH, Willett WC. Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 348:g3437, 2014.
- Farvid MS, Cho E, Chen WY, Eliassen AH, Willett WC. Adolescent meat intake and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 136(8):1909-20, 2015.
- Taylor EF, Burley VJ, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Meat consumption and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Br J Cancer. 96(7):1139-46, 2007.
- Lo JJ, Park YM, Sinha R, Sandler DP. Association between meat consumption and risk of breast cancer: Findings from the Sister Study. Int J Cancer. 146(8):2156-2165, 2020.
- Genkinger JM, Makambi KH, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L, Adams-Campbell LL. Consumption of dairy and meat in relation to breast cancer risk in the Black Women’s Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 24(4):675-84, 2013.
- Ferrucci LM, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, et al. Intake of meat, meat mutagens, and iron and the risk of breast cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Br J Cancer. 101(1):178-84, 2009.
- Farvid MS, Sidahmed E, Spence ND, Angua KM, Rosner BA, Barnett JB. Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 36(9):937-951, 2021.
- Alexander DD, Morimoto LM, Mink PJ, Cushing CA. A review and meta-analysis of red and processed meat consumption and breast cancer. Nutr Res Rev. 23(2):349-65, 2010.
- Missmer SA, Smith-Warner S-A, Spiegelman D, et al. Meat and dairy food consumption and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol. 31(1):78-85, 2002.
- Farvid MS, Stern MC, Norat T, et al. Consumption of red and processed meat and breast cancer incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 143(11):2787-2799, 2018.
- Guo J, Wei W, Zhan L. Red and processed meat intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 151(1):191-8, 2015.
- Wu J, Zeng R, Huang J, et al. Dietary protein sources and incidence of breast cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrients. 8(11): 730, 2016.
- Taylor VH, Misra M, Mukherjee SD. Is red meat intake a risk factor for breast cancer among premenopausal women? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 117(1):1-8, 2009.
- Boyd NF, Stone J, Vogt KN, Connelly BS, Martin LJ, Minkin S. Dietary fat and breast cancer risk revisited: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Br J Cancer. 89(9):1672-85, 2003.
Updated 06/06/24